Sermon ÒMargaret
FullerÓ The Rev. Rali Weaver
I wonder if any of us
can really imagine what life was like for our grandmothers and great
grandmothers in this country in the early 1800Õs. Imagine being unable to continue your education beyond
grammar school. Being trained for
the express purpose of marrying a person your parents chose for you (sometimes
the highest bidder) instead of choosing to marry whomever you love. Imagine not
being legally allowed to own property or inherit it from your parents or
husband. Imagine never being engaged
in conversation about things that matter to you, being restricted to the
employment as a housekeeper, a childcare provider, a teacher of young girls, a
seamstress or a cook.
I daresay that at the
time Alvan Lamson was called to be the minister here women were not invited to
speak in this church. Not for the
sermon, not for the reading of the scripture and not for the
announcements. It was not until
1880 that the Dedham Branch of the WomenÕs Alliance was founded in some part to
empower the women of this church to leadership positions of their own because
there was no room for women to serve in the leadership of the church of their
day. The benevolent funds of
this church were endowed specifically to support women in need reflective of a
time when there were very few resources for women in this parish.
We so often celebrate
the names of our founding fathers.
We talk with pride about the foundations of our church and parish. The interior of our sanctuary is hung
with four paintings, all of white men.
Where are the women of our history? We rarely acknowledge the
deleterious effects that not being legally able to own property, or to sign a
contract of any kind, or to get a decent education or to be able to vote had on
women in this country. We might
truly make sense at least intellectually of the losses to African Americans who
were brought to our country as slaves but women, kept as indentured servants
for generations, under the guise of being something weaker and less able, were
interminably limited by the gender they were given at birth.
I bring all this up
today because these are the injustices that Margaret Fuller spent the majority
of her 40 years of life writing and arguing and speaking up about.
Margaret Fuller was
born in Cambridge Massachusetts on the 23 of May 1810. Next Sunday marks the 200th
anniversary of her birth.
She was a remarkable
individual who lived a singular life. From an early she age lived outside the
constructs of societies ideal of what a woman should be and lived instead in
accord with her own sense of what would make her happy.
It helped that she was
born into a supportive family where she learned to read at the age of three and
her father encouraged her to read everything she put her hands on and continued
her education with private tutors beyond his own ability to educate her.
By the age of thirty
Margaret Fuller was considered the best-read person (male or female) in the
entire country. An avid feminist
at the outset of the womenÕs suffrage movement, she strove to articulate the
plight of women in political, professional and educational fields.
Fuller was one of the
New England transcendentalists that met in Elizabeth PeabodyÕs Bookstore to
share ideas. (Perhaps you
remember Elizabeth Peabody as the Unitarian founder of the first Kindergarten)
At PeabodyÕs shop Margaret began a series of ÒConversations for WomenÓ which
encouraged women to talk more freely about subjects upon which they were not
schooled.
It was out of that
shop that Ralph Waldo Emerson founded the transcendentalist magazine called
ÒThe DialÓ of which Fuller was its first editor and chief writer (an uncommon
honor in her time when women were rarely engaged as writers.)
Horace Greeley noticed
her impressive writing style and invited her to write for the New York Tribune
where she was finally able to earn a living as a writer. At his request she wrote her most
famous work, which we read in part this morning, Women in the Nineteenth
Century. At thirty-five Fuller was
asked to be the Italian News Correspondent for the Tribune and that is where
she fell in with the Italian revolutionaries and felt at home for the first
time in her life, surrounded by those who championed the causes of the
disenfranchised.
Just five years later,
at 40 years of age, Margaret and her chosen husband, Italian revolutionary
Giovanni Ossoli and their young son, while traveling back to settle in the
United States, where shipwrecked on sand bar off the coast of Long Island and
the ship they were on broke apart and Fuller and her husband and young son died
at sea.
Her friends were
rightly shocked and dismayed at the news of her death. Ralph Waldo Emerson mourned that he had
Òlost her in his audience.Ó; Thoreau rushed to New York and spent five days
scouring Fire Island in search of her remains and any scrap of the last book
she was working on, to not avail.
ÒHers was a unique intellectÓ, Barrett Brown pointed out, uniquely
poised for a Òconversation that was vastly superior to her writing.Ó at the
same time Thomas Carlyle described her with Òsuch a predetermination to eat
this big Universe as her oyster or egg I have not before seen in any human
soul.Ó
It occurs to me that
even in this historic place things have changed quite dramatically since
Margaret FullerÕs time. To begin
with Women speaking on complex subjects is not (I hope) an unconventional
experience for most of us.
And yet it occurs to
me that there are women throughout the world who are still denied equal
education. There are women in our
country who continue to earn significantly less salary than their male
counterparts. There are women even
our society though well educated and hard working who cannot get ahead in their
professional careers because of their gender, there are still women who are
brought to this country to be married to strangers and sold as prostitutes. The
gender discrimination though more subtle continues to exist.
Oppressions toward
those who are other in our society does not end there, there are people
targeted by the police because of their skin color, there are people denied
civil rights because of their sexual orientation. Generations of oppression
continue to disenfranchise the many while generations of privilege continue to
enfranchise only a few.
What might happen if
our entire world could truly embody the concept Margaret Fuller articulated in
her writing the simple ideal: that we are all connected. If we understood with
our senses that as long as any one of us male or female, black or white, rich
or poor, responsible or irresponsible, gay or straight, optimistic or
pessimistic, generous or greedy- as long as any part of the duality cannot
Òlive freely and unimpededÓ then none of us is free. What Òarbitrary barriersÓ must be thrown down for all of us
to work together for common purposes?
Over the past year we
have strived to be in conversation about issues of welcoming.
What does it mean to
really open to conversation with what is ÒotherÓ to us now?
How might we be
changed or opened by that dialogue. Where do our fears lie, where are the
unconscious barriers? Where are the intentional ones?
By her life and
through her actions Margaret Fuller embodied the way that conversations can
open us to more possibility. She
encouraged through her writing and conversation that we continually bring more
voices to the table.
As we celebrate her
life today I think it is important that we recognize all the conversations that
aid us in speaking the truth to injustice.
Let us strive to find
our voices.
Let us continually
open our minds and hearts to more possibilities.
I hope we can look at
our Annual Meeting this morning as a sort of conversation in the spirit of
Margaret Fuller, a chance to engage in the ideas that will help us to live more
fully as a community of faith. I
know it may seem that most of this meeting is about routine things. But each year at our spring meeting we
elect new officers. When you think
about the fact that for hundreds of years this church was governed only by men,
any way you look at it a slate of officers that invites a winder number of
voices to the Parish Committee table is progress.
Whether it passes or
not, when we think of adding a bylaw, to bylaws that havenÕt been modified
since the 1950Õs, this denotes progress.
To have spent a year
in conversations about becoming more welcoming and open our minds to
intentionally inviting new and other voices to our table is part of the same
conversation Margaret Fuller began over 200 years ago.
Passing a draft budget
may not be all that exciting of an event in any organizations life cycle, but
when we engage in conversations about money through the efforts of the Finance
Committee and the Parish Committee and the Budget Hearings and the Annual
meeting and we come up with a budget that reflects our collective values this
too is progress.
Just as Margaret
FullerÕs conversations in Elizabeth PeabodyÕs shop began a wider conversation
that altered the lives of women in our country forever so may our efforts
within the context of this church have the possibility to change the course of
our history as a parish where more people are invited to the table and all
voices are welcome.
And on this her near
birthday let us thank all those who invited us to speak and made room our
voices.