Sermon ÒWhat
Keeps Us Separate?Ó
The
Rev. Rali Weaver
My sermon title this morning is a question that
originates from a mantra recited on Street Retreats as part of the Faithful
Fools Street Ministry in San Francisco.
ÒWhat holds us separate, what
keeps us separate, is not as much as what still connects us.Ó
The Faithful Fools are a
social witness ministry who walk with the homeless in the streets of San
Francisco to witness and help them to articulate their lives.
Their mission statement reads:
Today as we begin to explore
how we might as a community take more responsibility for the needs of the
Dedham Food Pantry, I thought it might be good and right for us to explore our
own judgments and participate in shattering any myths we might carry about
those living in poverty. To do so I thought it might help to begin by
meditating upon the Faithful Fools Mantra ÒWhat holds us separate, What keeps
us separate, is not as much as what still connects us.Ó
Maybe you could say that with
me
ÒWhat holds us separate, what
keeps us separate is not as much as what still connects us.Ó
Say it again with me. ÒWhat
holds us separate, what keeps us separate is not as much as what still connects
us.Ó
I want you to imagine walking
through some of the poorer neighborhoods of San Francisco or the poorer
neighborhoods in Boston – or closer yet here in Dedham. As you imagine walking along the
streets of East Dedham, or Mattapan or Dorchester or Roxbury-- I want you to
imagine repeating that phrase over and over ÒWhat holds us separate what keeps
us separate is not as much as what still connects us.Ó
When the Faithful Fools say
these words they say them in the midst of spending a day or a week living
alongside the homeless in their streets.
The majority of the people who go on these retreats go on them just once
but these first impressions alter their perception of poverty and homelessness
forever.
When you walk the streets of
the city without a place to go, it is easy to see why loitering might be a
necessary evil. When you stand on the line for the soup kitchen and after an
hour or more of waiting are told they have run out of food you realize how
hungry missing one meal can make you when you donÕt know when you will get to
eat again.
Little awarenesses -- we all
need underwear and shoes, water to drink is not always free or easy to find,
having a place to sit or to get out of the sun, or warm up, or go to the
bathroom is something every body needs—These little awarenesses help to
dismantle our privilege and dispel the myths that hold us separate.
When I spent the day in the
streets of San Francisco with the Faithful Fools I realized how difficult it is
to feel safe or at ease in the city and I wondered what could be blessed about
being poor. The young adults I had with me started to make sense of the need
for pleasure among the homeless men and women we got to know. They saw a reason
behind the drug and nicotine usage and how small pleasures and quick fixes
could raise spirits in the short term. Which came first, they would wonder, the
drugs or the homelessness?
One day I was walking home
after a day of sight seeing and I encountered a relatively well-dressed Black
woman who was asking for help.
Could she have $20 dollars? I had heard so many of these stories before
but then I noticed a bruise above her right eye. Her story was of being abused,
of needing to flee and $20 would get her to her sisterÕs house. I had no money on me and wanted to give
her my phone number at the church but had no pen. What surprised me was that
she, better dressed than I at the time, asked six or seven people for something
to write with and not one of them would look at her or help. I finally realizing what was happening
asked the next person who passed if they had a pen and they handed it to me
right away. The color of our skin
and no other factor could have made the people passing respond in that
way. That experience and her story
weighed on my heart. What would become of her? Where would she end up? I did give her my phone number and lent her what help I
could.
And later, I dreamed of
archiving the stories of the homeless and disenfranchised in that city, not
because they were to be admired but because they were living beings that were
invisible on the streets. Her
story became part of my story. Her plight my plight. I thought if we could
share the stories of those in the streets, eventually people of privilege (like
me) might realize there are not so many differences between us.
When I shared my dream with a
close colleague his response was short and abrupt: ÒYou know Rali, familiarity
really does bread contemptÓ.
On the contrary however her
story had not bred contempt in my heart but a deep longing for change and I
began to wonder again: what keeps us separate? Is it our apathy? or an active
need to maintain the status quo? or fear for our own safety?
I saw the same phenomenon in
Boston. Very few people knew the names of the homeless people they would pass
every day. Michael, who greeted
every visitor to Charles Street, or John who bummed cigarettes in the Boston
Common all day would at times be described at parties I went to as Òthat man
with the frog like voiceÓ or Òthe man who stands in front of DelucaÕsÓ. They were characters in peopleÕs lives
but rarely characters with known names.
And more often these people we passed daily in the streets werenÕt
noticed at all. What keeps us separate? Is it our apathy? or an active need to
maintain the status quo? or fear for our own safety?
I must admit I am certain
this may not be anyone elseÕs concern. I am a minister with a deep call within
my heart to help the disenfranchised, to help the invisible become visible.
This may not be your call. But if
we live in a society that is able to turn a blind eye to the experience of a
few, when might they turn their blind eye to you, or to me? Why arenÕt we all a part of each
otherÕs story? Why arenÕt the
needs of the few our needs?
You have probably seen
the passage written by Pastor Martin Niemoller a
prominent anti-Nazi theologian:
ÒIn Germany they first came for the Communists,
and
I didnÕt speak up because I wasnÕt a Communist. Then they came for the
Jews,
and I didnÕt speak up because I wasnÕt a Jew. then they came for the trade
unionists,
and I didnÕt speak up because I wasnÕt a trade unionist. Then
they came for the Catholics,
and I didnÕt speak up because I was a
Protestant. Then they came for me —
and by that time no one was
left to speak up.Ó
ArenÕt all
the dividing lines put there to intentionally keep us separate? To keep us from acting in the best
interest of our neighbor?
When William Ellery Channing
helped to form the Benevolent Fraternity that is now the Unitarian Universalist
Urban Ministry, its mission was to Òelevate the poorÓ. At the time the poor people of
Boston could not go to church because to go to church you had to buy a pew, and
if you could not buy a pew you could not have a seat in church. I wonder how many of us could not sit
in church if that same system were in place today? Channing and his collegues in ministry strove to build
separate chapels to provide a place of worship to the poor and thus elevate
their thoughts to those of the men who could afford the better seats.
There is something to my
sensibilities that is both wonderful and horrible about this. It is wonderful because they noticed a
need and were trying to meet it.
But I ask you why not provide seating in your own church for those in
need? Why make a separate and most likely not equal place for worship?
Still this was the beginning
of our UU Urban Ministry that does a great deal to meet the needs of the
disenfranchised in our city.
For the past four years I
have attended the UU Urban MinistryÕs annual meeting and the one consistent
theme is how much the providers learn and gain from their work with those in
need. Maya Angelou once wrote that
she had Òfound that among its other benefits, giving liberates the soul of the
giverÓ and this is truly what the UU Urban ministry embodies. Congregations involved in its work
proclaim the great benefits they receive. Staff members hired to work at the UU
Urban Ministry speak of how the work they do has transformed their own
lives.
True generosity and goodness
engender transformative work, and I want that for all of us.
As we think about the
underserved families in our own town, I wonder how we might liberate our own
spirit as a church by providing for those in need.
The food pantry has in fact
found a new home. I hope you will stay after worship to hear more about
it. I donÕt want to spoil all the
surprise but I can tell you that it is a step up from the basement they have
occupied for twenty years. But if
we keep in mind the mantra we started out with we must ask what holds us
separate? What kept the Food Pantry in an inadequate space that clients and
workers had to carry bags up and down stairs, where clients with handicaps
could not easily access the space?
What might it be like if we
provided for the food pantry in the way that we might want to be provided for?
The forbearers of this parish felt a connection to the work of the court and so
provided the land so long as the court should need it. What if we in our time felt the same
pressing need for the food pantry? How might our vision shift if we put aside
our fears and refused to separate our desires from those of the hungry and in
need in our community? What type
of permanent home for the food pantry would we desire to build if it were OUR
food pantry?